Executive Brief — Service Provider¶
Part of the Domain Connect Knowledge Base · Product Edition: Service Providers
The 60-Second Pitch¶
The last step before our product delivers value is connecting the customer's domain — and it happens in a registrar control panel we don't control. About half of users fail manual DNS setup. That costs us activations, support time, and documentation we keep rewriting for every registrar.
Domain Connect is an open standard, in production since 2016 and now on the IETF Standards Track, that replaces this step with a "Connect automatically" button. The customer approves at their DNS provider and comes back with DNS configured exactly right. GoDaddy, IONOS, Cloudflare and ~17 other DNS providers support it; Microsoft 365, Google Workspace and Shopify are among 408 services already using it.
The integration is small, the manual path stays as fallback, and we can measure the lift directly. I'm asking for Phase 0 to measure our addressable share, then Phase 1 to build it and roll out at our top DNS providers.
One-Page Brief¶
Problem. Connecting a domain requires customers to enter DNS records by hand at their registrar. ~50% fail (Microsoft 365 data). Failures cost activations, generate support tickets and require registrar-specific documentation that goes stale.
Proposal. Integrate Domain Connect: publish a template for our service, sign requests, detect support during onboarding and offer one-click setup where available.
Why now.
- 294 DNS providers, covering ~42% of scanned domains, already support it [replace with our measured share]
- 1,436 service providers — including our peers — already have templates; customers increasingly expect one-click setup
- IETF standardization (DCONN WG, Oct 2025) means one integration with a long future
- The manual path stays, so risk is contained and the lift is measurable
Investment. Small engineering build for the synchronous flow, using open-source client libraries; partner effort to get the template deployed at key DNS providers. [Insert engineering sizing from Phase 0.]
Expected outcomes. [Insert figures from the business-case worksheet.]
- Higher completion of the domain step for customers on supporting providers
- Shorter time from signup to working domain
- Fewer DNS-related support tickets; less registrar-specific documentation
Risks and controls. Coverage is partial — measured up front, with manual fallback. Template changes are costly — designed for stability from day one. Signing key — stored and rotated like other production secrets. We never handle customer DNS credentials.
Decision requested. Approve Phase 0 (addressable share, baseline, sizing) and Phase 1 (template and integration), with Phase 2 rollout to DNS providers driven by measured results.
Tailoring the Message¶
| Audience | Lead with | Bring |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Activation and retention; peers already use it | The 60-second pitch, the numbers table, Service Provider CEO story |
| Engineering | Small, well-defined integration; libraries and example service | Scope of Work, Getting Started, Service Provider developer story |
| Security | No customer credentials; signed requests; key management | Security Model, Risks & Objections |
| Support | Fewer "my email doesn't work" tickets; less documentation | Service Provider support story |
| Product / growth team | Funnel lift with a built-in comparison group | Service Provider PM story, Business Case |
| Finance | Worksheet with our own data; measure before scaling | Business Case |
Your First Steps After Approval¶
- Run the
_domainconnectlookup on a sample of customer domains to measure addressable share - Try the customer experience yourself at exampleservice.domainconnect.org with a domain at a supporting DNS provider
- Pick your template pattern in 15 — Template Use Cases and find a similar existing template in the repository
- Hand engineering Getting Started: Service Provider and the Implementers Edition
- Join the community at domainconnect.org/getting-started and start the conversation with your top DNS providers early
Previous: Risks & Objections · Back to: Product Edition overview